Fan Scene- CT Jan- Mar 1984

 

Yes, the return of a series I ran nearly ten years ago on early issues of the DWAS fanzine Tardis and its newsletter Celestial Toyroom, this time covering the Doctor Who and fan happenings as reported during 1984. 

 JANUARY

Gordon Roxburgh is the editor as we enter 1984 which seems to have been compiled just after the broadcast of `The Five Doctors` as there was a lag of several weeks from the issues being assembled to being mailed out. So there’s some news of the twenty first season which would be starting by the time members received the issue. Amongst the snippets of news on the yellow front page are that the Society donated £100 to the recent Children In Need appeal, and the release of a Doctor Who computer game called `The First Adventure` It may boast Peter Davison’s face on the cover, but the game takes its cue from the Key To Time season. There’s a reprint of a couple of newspaper previews of `The Five Doctors` and some comment on the decision to screen it in the US before the UK.

Twenty one years later...

 

Whatever your view of the recently curtailed RTD2, there’s no doubt that the showrunner’s first era was peak Doctor Who. This is an (occasionally re-edited) overview of that period in the show’s history, originally penned in 2010 for the zine Plaything of Sutekh. You can see my enthusiasm and if I’m honest, looking back at this period now, my zeal remains undiminished. As well as being a fan of the classic series, I feel that the 2005-10 period contains some of the best Doctor Who ever!

Once upon a time people used to define eras of Doctor Who by the incumbent Doctor so they would refer to the `Troughton Era` for example. A bit later, it was the producer who would be given all the credit, hence the `Hinchliffe Era`. Later still when we knew more about the way the programme was made; we’d refer perhaps to the Barry Letts / Terrance Dicks Era, recognising the invaluable creative input of the script editor. Latterly it reached a point where it seemed you could actually define three distinct Eras under the aegis of the show’s longest running producer John Nathan Turner. In fact, it was never even as simple as all of that but one thing we can never be in doubt about regarding the 2005-10 period of broadcast Doctor Who is that to call it the Russell T Davies Era is totally- factually- correct.

Farewell to the Lyric Hotel

As time trundles on, we forget places that once seemed important and then quite often find out decades later that they are gone. I recently discovered that the Lyric Hotel in Blackpool was demolished in 2023. Some Doctor Who fans of a certain generation will remember the Lyric as the hub of the annual Blackpool gatherings that took place each May. The Lyric was every much the centre of these events as half the attendees stayed there, the others in a hotel two doors way, and were sure of a warm welcome from the family that owned the hotel. As far as I can tell the Lyric did not relocate and so is gone forever which I suppose also reflects changing times.

 

Timelash

 In a nihilistic season packed with implied or actual violence, `Timelash` stands apart as being a more traditional Doctor Who story. A regular near the foot of fan votes it seems to be written off as a bit of a mess. Yet like such stories there is something of worth if you watch it with an open mind and try to forget all the brickbats that have been hurled towards it. With Pennant Roberts again lumbered with bright sets (as he was in `Warriors of the Deep`) the story is already hamstrung while Glen McCoy’s script feels like it needed more work and production values are not the best. There are interesting concepts within it but the resulting production doesn’t always do justice to them. I’ve heard `Timelash` summarised variously yet almost always in the negative but I would say its middling. I don’t even think it’s the worst story of this season but I would agree that it’s presentation does not help its case.

 

Attack of the Cybermen

John Nathan Turner was right when he claimed that “the memory cheats”. At the time he was referring to Sixties and earlier Seventies Doctor Who against which many of his stories were being unfavourably compared. Now that this era is of an even older vintage watching a story like this shows how accurate he was. I’ve always held `` `Attack of the Cybermen` as an example of how terrible the show was at this point. One moment in particular is stuck in my memory when a brick wall sweeps to one side to reveal a brightly lit group of Cybermen like some tv variety show introduction. In fact, this occurs sooner in the story than I recalled and the only reason the light seems so bright is because we’ve spent the previous few minutes mooching around in semi darkness. The story is full of little moments like this which I’d forgotten or mis remembered because it must be more than twenty years since I’ve seen it. That is not to wholly redeem the story which is rather messy at times, but does show its not as poor as I thought it was.

 

Doctor Who Annual 1976

 

By 1975/ 76 Doctor Who on tv had become more sophisticated in its storytelling yet the Annuals continued to run stories that more often than not lacked the then current approach of the series. Some of them feel generic as if they might be lifted from a pool that could be applied to any Doctor. The 1976 Annual does at least sometimes have the Doctor, Sarah and Harry sounding (though rarely looking) like they do on screen while there is one story so packed with great ideas it seems too good for this format. Annuals were always dated for the following year and this edition was actually published in September 1975 so the makers would presumably only have seen some of Tom Baker’s first season. Tom’s Doctor stares out from the cover looking somewhat unimpressed. Has he just read the stories?

My Time on the DWAS Executive Part Two

 

“My Favourite Waste of Time”

One event I attended in mid 1985 was LogiCon hosted by the Solihull local group the same day as Live Aid. I’m sure they asked Bob to move his event, but it wasn’t happening. We couldn’t compete with Queen, Paul McCartney, Wham and co but I did end up on stage interviewing Graham Williams, Ian Marter and Richard Gregory. This wasn’t planned, in fact Paul Vanezis asked me the evening beforehand even though probably anyone else there was more suited. Back then of course with no prep and no Google, I had to rely on my tragically vast knowledge of Doctor Who related facts and wing it when it came to the rest of their careers.  Anyway, I muddled through and now that embarrassing clips have turned up on two recent Collection films I think I was ok, maybe not projecting enough. For the record I have never done any on stage interviewing before or since but I’m kind of glad I did it. I’ll tell you though, the one person who seemed less comfortable going on stage than me was Graham Williams whose suggestion we have ` a couple of pints` beforehand (this was lunchtime) did indeed help the interview go more smoothly.

What will they do with Doctor Who?

 

As anyone reading this might know, today the BBC announced that this year’s proposed Xmas special had been cancelled and that  both Russell T Davies and Bad Wolf are leaving the franchise. Doctor Who as a property will remain owned by the BBC and the programme making will be put out to competitive tender. Neither of these are too much of surprise, rumours to this effect have been circulating online for a few months. What it means is that the show may not be back for an unknown number of years. Conservative estimates say two years, some suggest more like five or six. As I’m sure the tabloids of old would put it- Who Knows?

My Time on the DWAS Executive Part One

 To mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Doctor Who Appreciation Society (aka DWAS) this year, I thought I'd post this amended two part version of an article I wrote back in the early Nineties. Its about the time I spent as part of the DWAS' organising committee... 

“Hold the Door!”

It’s 1985. The location is a plush hotel somewhere in London. I’m standing behind a table holding two large doors shut because if someone doesn’t keep them closed a breeze will chill the two guests currently sat at a table in front of me signing autographs- John Nathan Turner and Colin Baker. Or perhaps there’s a bison lurking on the other side of those doors, I’m not quite sure. I doubt the two stars are even aware of my presence and I’m not really even supposed to be here. However, as the person who is supposed to be here hasn’t turned up, here I am. For me it affords a view of the heart of Doctor Who fandom eagerly queuing for a few moments chat and an autograph. If this sounds like a familiar pastime (the autographs not the door holding) then it’s worth remembering that at conventions nowadays people pay a fee for this sort of thing and doors are so good nobody needs to physically hold them closed. Back in the day you would pay to attend the event but autographs were free. You could even take a picture though there was no social media to publish it on.

Blog Pages

 The links to this blog's pages are working again- these take you to additional content. On a laptop or desktop screen these are tabs below the blog title. If you're looking on a phone, click on the small down arrow in the grey Move to... tab underneath the header.

There's plenty to find in these Pages-

Blackpool Exhibition Pix - selected photos from the 70s Doctor Who Exhibition in Blackpool!

Click below for more...

The DWAS Yearbook 1976

 

In the Society’s early days as well as the regular fanzines they would also publish a Yearbook and the first of these covers much of what happened during the DWAS’s first year. Fronted by Stuart Glazebrook’s artwork of the  Doctor Sarah and the TARDIS in front of a planet and a sun (with the Doctor’s scarf providing a frame for the picture), the first yearbook had forty pages and was A5 size. Published in February 1977 and edited by Keith Barnfather it includes reviews of each Season 13 story accompanied by artwork.

The Caves of Androzani

Is `The Caves of Androzani` the best Doctor Who story ever? It’s a bold claim that’s not quite as unanimously supported as people imagine. Looking at old zines recently I found a letter from someone who preferred `The Twin Dilemma`! What we can say is that it is the best of this season by a significant distance and probably the best story for eight years at least. Had Robert Holmes not been contracted (producer John Nathan Turner was initially opposed to any old writers returning) or had Graeme Harper not been given a chance despite relatively little overall directorial experience, then the fifth Doctor’s finale might have turned out rather differently. The old hand and the new recruit combined to create something that still seems fresh and which, unlike most old Doctor Who, could still be shown to modern audiences and appeal to their sensibility.

The Dalek Masterplan - existing episodes reviewed

 

With two further episodes of this story having been recently found and now available to watch on BBC iPlayer, we can get a broader impression of `The Dalek Masterplan` though there is still more than half of it missing. The lengthy gap since any other missing episodes were found raises hopes that it may still not be too late for more from this story to be found. Given the speed with which characters and locales change there’s still a fair amount of significant material we’ve not seem. Nevertheless we now have the first three episode plus part five giving us a large portion of the first half. Let’s be optimistic that some more of the second half might be found to join the only later episode available. Anyway, this does seem an opportune moment to review the episodes we do have, in sequence.

Planet of Fire / The Twin Dilemma

 Planet of Fire

`Planet of Fire` seems to have been somewhat forgotten over the years despite being only the second time the show filmed overseas as well as Turlough’s farewell and Peri’s debut. Yet amidst gemstones like `Revelation, `Frontios` and `Caves` its volcanic landscape cannot really compete when the drama happening within it is comparatively tepid. Its just one of those Doctor Who stories about which few fans have strong feelings about either way. So is that reputation justified?

Resurrection of the Daleks

One of the aspects that distinguished the Hinchliffe/ Holmes era was that, however bleak the scenario, lively dialogue, character interaction and some dark humour gave it more depth. Eric Saward seems to have watched that era but perhaps not as closely as a script editor should because while he brings the nihilistic grit, he omits the nuances that made it more palatable. Sometimes this works giving the show an unexpectedly dark thematic palette. Sometimes however it can be too unrelenting. The Daleks were never a barrel of laughs so one expects their stories to skew grimmer than others and `Resurrection of the Daleks` definitely does that.