In a nihilistic season packed with implied or actual violence, `Timelash` stands apart as being a more traditional Doctor Who story. A regular near the foot of fan votes it seems to be written off as a bit of a mess. Yet like such stories there is something of worth if you watch it with an open mind and try to forget all the brickbats that have been hurled towards it. With Pennant Roberts again lumbered with bright sets (as he was in `Warriors of the Deep`) the story is already hamstrung while Glen McCoy’s script feels like it needed more work and production values are not the best. There are interesting concepts within it but the resulting production doesn’t always do justice to them. I’ve heard `Timelash` summarised variously yet almost always in the negative but I would say its middling. I don’t even think it’s the worst story of this season but I would agree that it’s presentation does not help its case.
Not that it’s without
faults. For one thing there’s not enough narrative to sustain the two forty -five
minute episodes; the antagonist is seemingly defeated with twenty minutes to go
(early in part 4 to use old money) and though he does pop back at the end it’s
after a significant lag in which filler material is obvious. That lengthy
debate in the Tardis for example adds nothing new and seems solely written to
fill several minutes. Even the impending arrival of a Bandril missile is drawn
out too long to keep any tension going.
The story sometimes
seems over verbose but often with little purpose; beyond exposition scenes
conversations are banal. Early on there is promise that the Doctor and Peri’s
relationship has become less needly – Baker in particular is excellent in
stretches of this story. Yet this Doctor’s off-putting arrogance keeps creeping
back while poor Nicola Bryant gets little to do except moan and be captured.
I’m not sure why writers thought this dynamic would be appealing; she can
clearly do so much more while he is at his best when the bellowing is replaced
by a more considered approach. So the lengthy scenes in the Tardis early on are
the story’s most trying moments even if the juddery camera effect used for the time
corridor is effective. I do think it looks a bit silly to have the Doctor and
Peri tied to the console like mountain climbers, what’s wrong with the tried
and trusted falling from one side of the set to the other! This is one of those
parts of the story that seems to re-use recent ideas- there was a time corridor
last season, the Borad’s fascination with Peri seems to echo Sharaz Jek as does
his unfortunate countenance and fear of seeing it.
While I’m not always a
fan of the idea that the Doctor somehow or other was the cause of most
significant historical and cultural developments, the inclusion of a young HG
Wells works rather well here. Aspects of the adventure he takes are clearly
intended to later inspire the idea of a time machine (albeit one whose look is
more suited to the author’s time period) while the Morlox provide an
alternatively spelt name for his underground dwellers. Was it deliberate too
that Glen McCoy named the character of Vena, to whom Herbert seems to take a
shine, to sound similar to Weena? The Borad and his experiments could be the
foundation for the Island of Doctor Maorau. David Chandler’s light
hearted portrayal of Hubert really conveys a character who never allows fear to
overtake fascination. It’s absolutely plausible to believe this will be a man
who writes some of the earliest science fiction, a phrase he even mentions in
the story. You wonder why the dialogue for some of the other guest characters
could not be as good as his.
The other stand out
guest actor is Robert Ashby as the Borad, a villain I found quite fascinating
even if he is not fully developed. For the most part he is calm and collected
yet his voice betrays a malice and purpose. We don’t actually see him fully
till later in the second episode and it is an impressively gruesome visage he presents.
Half his face is covered in prosthetics resembling some aquatic creature, the other allows the actor to express
the Borad’s somewhat evil intent. Like many elements of this story, the Borad’s
background is somewhat hazily sketched- we don’t even know why he is called
that though we do find out his real name is Magelen whom the Doctor has met
before. Given this period’s propensity for The Master turning up in elaborate
disguise those early scenes of the back of his chair and muttering about how he
knows the Doctor might have led some to incorrectly identify the Borad’s true
identity.
What we don’t rely discover
is how he managed to rise to such power and get the Timelash built. Indeed,
it’s not really certain what the Timelash is. It is feared and used as
punishment – people are flung into it presumably to be scattered randomly in
any era? There are elements of 1984 here, the constant surveillance, the
false image of the ruler but these are not really followed through. Instead, it
seems regime change can be executed in a single room.
Unfortunately,
production shortcomings mean the Timelash itself never looks in the least bit
powerful enough to even boil a kettle, never mind fling people through time. In
house BBC designers probably dreaded being assigned to Doctor Who with
it’s bizarre requirements but it didn’t necessarily need more money spending to
make this key device after which the story is named a bit more convincing. It
is just sparkly lights and what looks like tin foil. Even worse, when the
Doctor clambers inside it- the previously powerful forces seemingly unable to
snap a rope- there are bits of tinsel in between the rather better designed
crystals. I can see why the plot needed to explore the mechanics of the device
but it doesn’t work. It would have been better to have had those crystals
visible in the entrance as well because it doesn’t even look like the same
machine once the Doctor is inside it.
Yet some of the visuals
are really good. The single Android is quite earie and like much of 80s Doctor
Who would look even better if the lights were lower. Dean Hollingsworth
does a great job using body popping movement and mechanical speech while never
blinking. It’s a shame the budget couldn’t stretch to two of them though the
one they have is deployed well enough to distract from that. The Bandril- only
seen on a monitor- is effective while the Morlox is impressively tactile even
if the camera lingers a little too long. Quicker cuts here would make it more
menacing. The appearance of a somewhat arty portrait of the third Doctor is a
nostalgic touch though why is it implied the third Doctor had more than one
companion?
Underground, the rebels
seem remarkably well informed on events as they already know Tekker has taken
over as Malin which has only just happened. It would have been more interesting
to have spent some more time with them rather than the somewhat one note elite
whose conversations never sound natural. Dicken Ashworth was a familiar TV actor
at the time appearing in many tv shows but he gets very little to do here while
Tracy Louise Ward is at least given some decent material. What most fans
remember `Timelash` for is Paul Darrow giving what he himself said he based on
Richard the Third. It is totally out of sync with everyone else yet it sort of
works given that Tekker is clearly a bit of a bootlicker. Darrow is clearly having
fun with his demonstrative strutting about and hand gestures. By the way, at
the start there is a teenage Steven Mackintosh in one of his earliest roles.
`Timelash` has ideas
but not quite enough of them, it has an interesting story but it is poorly
paced and looks quite cheap in some aspects. If we can excuse time and money it
does feel as if this is a story that needed another pass at the writing stage
to shore up what is actually a decent enough concept.

.jpg)


No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.