In the Society’s early days as well as the regular fanzines
they would also publish a Yearbook and the first of these covers much of what
happened during the DWAS’s first year. Fronted by Stuart Glazebrook’s artwork
of the Doctor Sarah and the TARDIS in
front of a planet and a sun (with the Doctor’s scarf providing a frame for the
picture), the first yearbook had forty pages and was A5 size. Published in
February 1977 and edited by Keith Barnfather it includes reviews of each Season
13 story accompanied by artwork.
In the reviews Richard Landen finds `Terror of the Zygons` “a
bit run of the mill and predictable” and he seems to come up with his own
theory that the destruction of the Zygon planet resulted in the creation of
Axos. I don’t ever recall noticing that in the story! He likes the Zygon ship and finds the Zygons
themselves “colourful but non striking” Is that a typo? Just goes to show that
stories we now think of as classics were not originally accepted as such. Richard
is back for `Planet of Evil` and spends the first paragraph highlighting
various guest star’s previous Doctor Who appearances. While this may
seem basic now don’t forget this was long before fans could look this kind of
information up anywhere. Richard’ mission it seems was to create an invented
fact for each story; here he says that Morestra evolved fromm the Earth penal
colony Desperus as seen in `Dalek Masterplan`. Did it though Richard? This sort
of thing was quite common in those days; fans tried to patch things together
and find connections that were not necessarily there on screen.
Steve Ocock reviews `Pyramids of Mars` with more enthusiasm
and says that Stephen Harris “deserves a medal for an outstanding story”. Of
course we now know now that it would have been quite difficulty to track
`Stephen Harris` himself down to pin that medal on him! The review for the `The Android Invasion` goes
uncredited so it may have been penned by Keith Barnfather. Whoever it is finds
the scope of the story “too wide” making it “too complicated and therefore
rushed”. Jeannette Napier takes on
`Brain of Morbius` and calls it “one of the best stories since Tom Baker took
over the role” though the review is
mostly a synopsis of the story it is peppered with superlatives. Jeanette also
tackles `Seeds of Doom` though this is even more synopsis and very little opinion
probably written, as I suspect all these reviews were, in a bit of rush.
Next up are features on the two Exhibitions at Blackpool and
Longleat. At the time coverage of these was quite a rare thing so these are a
very descriptive way to relive those summer trips and is penned by Stuart
Glazebrook. The Yearbook also includes a couple of articles originally
published in `Tardis, the Society fanzine. `The Tardis` finds Jan Vincent
Rudzki detailing all we had found out about the ship up to that point. As
mentioned earlier, a paucity of alternative sources of information made articles
like this vital fifty years ago. `Who Was Susan Foreman` sees Jeremy Bentham
take a speculative look at the Doctor and Susan’s life before they left the
Time Lords. It’s all invented by Jeggers of course and because this is the
Seventies, the idea that Susan is the Doctor’s actual granddaughter was unacceptable.
Instead Bentham creates a theory wherein the Doctor was staying with the
Foreman family when they die in a fire, but Susan was saved by the Doctor and
taken back to Gallifrey where she was brought up.
The Yearbook lists the Target books released in 1976, which was a bumper year for titles ranging from `Curse of Peladon`, `The Abominable Snowman`, `The Green Death`, and more. The feature also covers things like TV Comic, the Ty Phoo cards and the revised edition of `The Making of Doctor Who`. Department reports follow on from this with summaries of the year’s activities from Jan Vincent Ruzki (Headquarters), Stephen Payne (Photographic), Jeremy Benthm (Reference), Stuart Glazebrook (Art), Brian Smith (Scottish office), Gordon Blows (Tardis), Keith Barnfather (Celestial Toyroom) and Mark Sinclair (Dramatics).
The season poll results feature on the next page. This was
an open vote in which all DWAS members were eligible to vote and were early
markers as to which stories would become classics and which were deemed duds. `Pyramids
of Mars` triumphs on 166 points ahead of `Seeds of Doom` which gained 136
points. In third place with 110 was `Terror of the Zygons`. Just three points
behind in fourth place is `Brain of Morbius` on 107. `Planet of Evil` is in fifth
place on 92 points and coming last was `The Android Invasion` with 81 points with
just less than half the votes of the winner. Strangely this is the exact order
I would put them in today. Finally at the end of the yearbook is a list of DWAS
department addresses.
The reviews could be better but don’t forget this was the
early days and the concept of writing a review of Doctor Who stories (as
opposed to just talking about them at school or wherever) was just catching on.
Overall the publication reflects the confidence and creativity of the DWAS less
than a year after it started.





No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.